Friday, October 30, 2015

THREE CHEERS FOR PFIZER

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-YylwcgeGD1s/U3qeA4kuc2I/AAAAAAAABh0/YlusuJ9uVEw/w140-h84-p/image.jpg

The U.S. Economy grew at a less than robust 1.5 percent in the third quarter, some of the heavy hitters in energy fear continued weak prices after booking losses during the quarter and a big shout out goes to Pfizer, the huge drug manufacturer, in their quest to send a shot across the bow of those tax-grubbing, freedom-stifling, anti-business politicians in Potomac Land.

In what could be the biggest nose-thumbing yet, Pfizer continues it's overseas quest to cut U.S. corporate taxes as it pursues an apparent takeover of Ireland's Allergan PLC, a $100 billion-plus pursuit, according to today's WSJ.

The move puts the huge maker of Advil and Viagra besides a host of other drugs once again in the cross hairs of a nasty debate with Congress about a company's right to locate its head office wherever and whenever it wants irrespective of tax consequences. That's really what's at stake here, liberty, absolute liberty, the real American way.

Recall Pfizer waged an earlier battle with Potomac Land's politically self-righteous last year when it tried to merge with UK drug maker AstraZeneca PLC for $120 billion before the deal fell through, bringing out the politically-initiated anti-American catcalls mostly from politicians living, playing and profiting on the left.

Known in the business as inversions, the Journal reports, last year "The Treasury Department announced a plan to make these deals less attractive, mostly by limiting access to overseas cash."
It's no secret that politicians and candidates "in both parties want to reduce the tax advantages of incorporating abroad, but they disagree on how to do it," the Journal said. Pfizer's tax rate for 2014 was nearly 26%.

Just this past week, the Journal reports, billionaire investor Carl Icahn "pledged a $150 million to a political-action committee that would lobby to reduce taxes on  corporate profits earned overseas and support legislation to block inversion."

We don't know Icahn's politics but we suspect they lean more left than right. His proposal is called an incentive though some might call it a bribe, something nearly every state government in the country worthy of the name uses to try to attract businesses from other higher-tax locales here and abroad.

For those who reside in high-tax states like California, it's commonplace to read about and run into bureaucrats from lower-tax areas like Mississippi and Texas trying to cajole local business away with lower tax incentives. And rightfully so. That, too, is called liberty.

The real truth is competitive is as competitive does and as the Journal notes, competition is particularly heavy in pharmaceuticals "where many of the largest players are based in lower-tax countries: 17 of the 25 biggest drug companies by value are foreign and paid an average 17% tax rate last year versus 24% for U.S. companies."

So here it is: Hip, Hip, Go Get 'Em Pfizer!






Thursday, October 29, 2015

BEWARE OF BUYBACK MEME

http://i.istockimg.com/file_thumbview_approve/46441116/5/stock-photo-46441116-digital-stock-exchange-panel.jpg

Besides cheap money courtesy of the Federal Reserve, investors for some time have been told the market's run-up owes much to corporate buy backs. A good thing for investors.

Like the old saying what comes around sooner or later goes around, that might be the case now with those stimulating buy backs investors apparently have come to love. There is a story today
 on ZeroHedge, "Goldman-finds-buybacks-no-longer-work-to-boost-stock-prices-two-reasons-why," worth a look.

Here's a couple of charts from the article that pretty much tell the tale, but read it for yourself.



Buying shares back at their highs, as noted, hardly seems like prudent business practices, especially when one recalls all those time businesses were hoarding cash because they could not, on the their terms, find prudent, meaningful investments.

A cynic might argue it's just another way to push up the value of their stock options. But since we don't know any real cynics, we just mention it in passing.
 



THE HINTING GOES ON AT FED

http://cdn.theatlantic.com/static/mt/assets/business/600%20fed%20REUTERS%20Jason%20Reed.jpg

The data prostitutes spoke again this week after their usual two-day meeting, hinting that the door for a December interest rate hike was still ajar.

The template once again centered on their shop-worn and now nearly silly, meaningless drivel about if the data supported a reason for the rate hike. One wonders when someone will come up with a television game show based on which outfit--politicians or central bankers--inspire the least confidence among the masses.

A rate hike when it does come will most likely boost the dollar making the lives of US multi-nationals even more difficult. A good number of the S&P 500 companies earn a good portion of their earnings overseas.

Stocks reacted to the news as expected with the Dow rising nearly 200 points. In September after the market swooned before Fed officials swooned themselves on hiking rates, the Fed pointed to lack of global growth, most particularly in China. Recall when this whole charade started back in 2008 the same Fed was interested only, they opined, in restoring U.S. growth.

After the market swooned in September the Fed sent out six of its hand-picked propaganda ambassadors to assuage investor nerves in its on-again-off-again nonsense. As the free money continues to flow, the Wall Street Journal today reports Fed Chair Janet Yellen is "planning to become more outspoken in the lead up" to the so-called big December decision.

All this data-dependent palaver is colloquially called analysis-paralysis. It's Fed speak for we are really clueless. As we said, the hinting goes on.




Sunday, October 25, 2015

OH THOSE SOGGY ENERGY PRICES

https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-tMgFJOUzqdU/VB2vIaQgcHI/AAAAAAAACGk/Nvb72bhMvfU/w140-h105-p/image.jpg

A lot this year has been written about about oil and gas prices.

Oil prices recently fell below $50 a barrel, a far cry from the $90 a barrel the oil market was reeling in this time a year ago. With all that carnage you would've thunk central bankers and their economic brothers would be loving it.

After all, the point of these folks and their political shills was to put more lucre in consumer pockets and, Presto!, rally growth. Housing, equities and businesses were parts of that growth. Couple cheaper energy prices with what now amounts to a form of cosmic scale QE--the Fed, EU, Japan and China, to name the heavy hitters-- and the sickly, suffering patient was suppose to be checking out of the rehab ward some time ago.

The Fed claims it can't find any inflation or at least not enough to meet its magical two percent figure that will tell everyone it's okay to start cranking up interest rates. Maybe the Fed should check with Congress?

The current administration in Washington took its lead from the inept Fed and once again stuck it to the COLA crowd, putting a lid on any increase in Social Security payouts for the upcoming year. Meanwhile, Congress voted themselves a raise. It's a given that Congressional folk don't live on fixed incomes like many of their constituents.

Government revenue has to come from some place and pension funds of older retirees is as welcome a place to bureaucrats as any. Meanwhile, those wily politicians from Potomac Land are voting to push up the debt ceiling to cover up more of their bipartisan incompetence and absence of discipline.

One poor, misguided soul and apparent apologist for the bankrupt leadership at the Fed, today wrote:

It’s now clear that China’s economic weakness is having a significant impact around the world, but it is not causing anything remotely similar to a 2008 style financial crisis.  In fact, US economic data has basically continued to muddle through.  It’s weak, but it’s not catastrophic.  And parts of the housing market actually look very strong.  So, the Fed has tilted their position ever so slightly to set the table for the potential that they could raise rates later in the year or early 2016.  I’d still err on the side of caution here and I probably would have communicated a 2016 potential hike more explicitly, but I think this statement is pretty prudent.

1. Let's take the first part of that paragraph. Where was the clarity back when nearly everyone and the camels they rode into Wall Street and the Federal Reserve on knew China was constructing all those huge people-less cities?

2. US economic data has continued to muddle through after nearly eight years in the face of one of the biggest giveaways in the  history of quasi-capitalism and central banking. That should engender a real vote of confidence.

3. The comment that the Fed has tilted the table so slightly for a potential rate hike before year end is almost too ludicrous to deserve any attention. It is the hallmark of this Fed since this whole mess began--pathetic indecisiveness.


Naturally, there will be huge amounts of criticism over every bit of this statement, but let’s be honest – the Fed is navigating the same uncertain ocean the rest of us are and they’re doing the best they can.  So far, I think they’ve done a prudent job.  This was the right move in my mind and markets and commentators will overreact and read more into this than they should.  After all, let’s remember – we’re talking about a 25 bps rate hike.  It’s practically meaningless in the grand scheme of things….

4. Here is another fallacy in this person's position. The rest of us might be trying to navigate an uncertain ocean, but there's a major difference: Most of us have never pretended we knew what was going on. The Fed has and, in its arrogance, still does. In fact, that is what they supposedly get paid to do. Moreover, if this uncertain ocean at this point is as baffling to them as it is suppose to be to us, then why does anyone need the Fed?

5. Finally, the person destroys his own argument. If the 25 basis point hike will be no big deal and, after a short negative reaction, we agree, it won't, why has it taken so much Fed hand-wringing to pull the trigger?

Here's our two word answer: Clueless incompetence.

So soggy energy prices, runaway cheap money or whatever, this is a Fed that more than a year ago first brooked the idea of cranking of interest rates. The excuse then was to prime investors for the eventual fact.  

Nearly 18 months later that priming is about as soggy as today's energy prices.









THEY NEVER GIVE UP

http://www.chinatoday.com/fin/mon/rmbnew50a.jpg

In case you got bored or just missed it, the Chinese last week pulled off their latest version of QE.

As the Wall Street Journal put it: "Central bank dials back rates, reserve requirements, helping extend stock rally,"causing the yuan to settle at "its lowest level in almost a month against the dollar." According the Journal, " China is the latest of the world's big economies to turn to its central bank to stimulate flagging growth."

Given the strength of the dollar, it's a move those buyers at Wal Mart will most likely love.

Couple that with ECB President Mario Draghi's recent comments about more possible QE coming from those quarters and it looks like a good old fashion game of Texas Hold'em when you calculate in the stumbling, bumbling, indecisive leadership at the Federal Reserve. They're all in there.
 
Of course, soothing investor nerves is always good for stock prices and European, U.S. and Chinese markets showed their appreciation by rallying somewhat. But beneath the rally--like that old saying still water runs deep--angst continues to loiter as this is China's sixth rate cut in a year and global economic growth appears to be more anemic than it was just six months ago.

Over in the option's pit puts were selling at a huge premium to calls on the VIX, the well-known volatility index. Could this be another case of  who knows what and when did they know it?

One thing certain about government bureaucrats, they never give up until they usually get it completely wrong. 

Thursday, October 15, 2015

LET THE RABBLE BEGIN

image.jpg

It's been said that "No decision is a decision."

That pretty much summarizes the Janet Yellen-led Federal Reserve Bank as talk picks up about a possible rate hike this month as those great economic soothsayers once again meet. In what has become the most anticipated rate hike in the long, inept history of this quasi-Federal institution the financial gossip and guessing continues. What's yours?

Somewhere it's been noted that when one starts with a false assumption or premise the conclusion is likely to be just as false. That fairly characterized the Fed and its policy makers. The false assumption is that these people have any clue about what they're doing and, accordingly, can do anything (something?) worthwhile to help the economy.

With little more than two months remaining for 2015, a rate increase now (though it could happen) is most unlikely given the history of this economic Federal foot-dragging group. When that first hike finally does hit the economic fan, expect a small hiccough and then more business as usual.

This is not another of those reputed "buy-the-dip times," but something quite different as in upgrade your portfolio for the long haul.  In the meantime, stay calm, upgrade and let the rabble rabble on.