You had to know that this was underway for a longtime.
A recent columnist for Time magazine suggested that Hillary supporters protest that she won the popular vote but lost owing to the electoral college rules by not paying their 2016 federal taxes.
That's interesting. You have the female czarist Janet Napolitano in California who runs the University of California system ordering campus police not to cooperate with either federal or local authorities if the new administration comes after all the illegal immigrant students currently in the system being paid by California taxpayer funds, many who fervently disagree with their taxes being used to support such illegal programs and blatant confiscation of tax dollars without an input from those who pay those taxes.
We have heard from some who intend to request for the state a complete breakdown of where their tax dollars are spent and if any are going to support this program intend to deduct that amount from the taxes in the upcoming tax season. These places in the system are being given to illegals at the expense of native born citizens who are not only qualified but in many cases more qualified for those seats. Those students' parents have been paying taxes to the state for in many cases years. More important Nepolitano is forcing public employees to possibly violate the law to keep their jobs. Is there any doubt given a PC zealot like Napolitano anything other would result?
If you or I urged people to violate federal laws you know what would happen. So why hasn't anyone filed a suite against Nepolitano and the university system?
Now we could call that Times columnist stupid, ignorant, rolling out one of their hateful epithets, but that would be pulling a page from their hateful tactic book. We actually support his motion and hope those disgruntled Hillary supporters do withhold their tax payments.We've felt overtaxed for years as we know millions of others have and that much of our tax receipts are going to support programs as we find just as egregious as they claim the election results are. So lets get this party started.
----
There have been murmurs about it all along.
Someday, they simply wouldn’t allow certain things to remain on the Internet any longer. The potential to reach a global audience with important information, and the idea that it could be in the hands of anyone is just too big.
So it is no surprise that many corporate giants from Silicon Valley are now putting forward a unified front to silence free speech on social media.
Hashtags, keywords and flagged accounts, logged in various databases, will be shared and enforced across the web. Shutting down content identified as unacceptable will now be streamlined, and leave unpopular posters with fewer places to peddle their extremist, outside views.
Many current incidents are being used to push the idea that a new online policing – and a pulling of the weeds – is now necessary.
The “fake news” purging campaign has reached across the blogosphere and alternative media and punished websites that have dared to report on such taboo topics as Pizzagate, Wikileaks email dumps, any controversial aspects of the Syrian war and many other serious topics which these agenda-driven companies have opted to suppress.
While these platforms offer the opportunity to reach a wide audience, the centrality of ubiquitous platforms like Facebook, Google and Twitter is, obviously, that they have the power to delete accounts and drive down audience response by tweaking the algorithm.
They can make you invisible.
That is the state of free speech in 2016. It can be eradicated at a moment’s notice, and perhaps for reasons you aren’t even aware of.
shtfplan.com/emergency-preparedness/this-is-the-purge-we-all-knew-was-coming-shutting-down-extremist-content
A recent columnist for Time magazine suggested that Hillary supporters protest that she won the popular vote but lost owing to the electoral college rules by not paying their 2016 federal taxes.
That's interesting. You have the female czarist Janet Napolitano in California who runs the University of California system ordering campus police not to cooperate with either federal or local authorities if the new administration comes after all the illegal immigrant students currently in the system being paid by California taxpayer funds, many who fervently disagree with their taxes being used to support such illegal programs and blatant confiscation of tax dollars without an input from those who pay those taxes.
We have heard from some who intend to request for the state a complete breakdown of where their tax dollars are spent and if any are going to support this program intend to deduct that amount from the taxes in the upcoming tax season. These places in the system are being given to illegals at the expense of native born citizens who are not only qualified but in many cases more qualified for those seats. Those students' parents have been paying taxes to the state for in many cases years. More important Nepolitano is forcing public employees to possibly violate the law to keep their jobs. Is there any doubt given a PC zealot like Napolitano anything other would result?
If you or I urged people to violate federal laws you know what would happen. So why hasn't anyone filed a suite against Nepolitano and the university system?
Now we could call that Times columnist stupid, ignorant, rolling out one of their hateful epithets, but that would be pulling a page from their hateful tactic book. We actually support his motion and hope those disgruntled Hillary supporters do withhold their tax payments.We've felt overtaxed for years as we know millions of others have and that much of our tax receipts are going to support programs as we find just as egregious as they claim the election results are. So lets get this party started.
----
There have been murmurs about it all along.
Someday, they simply wouldn’t allow certain things to remain on the Internet any longer. The potential to reach a global audience with important information, and the idea that it could be in the hands of anyone is just too big.
So it is no surprise that many corporate giants from Silicon Valley are now putting forward a unified front to silence free speech on social media.
Hashtags, keywords and flagged accounts, logged in various databases, will be shared and enforced across the web. Shutting down content identified as unacceptable will now be streamlined, and leave unpopular posters with fewer places to peddle their extremist, outside views.
Many current incidents are being used to push the idea that a new online policing – and a pulling of the weeds – is now necessary.
The “fake news” purging campaign has reached across the blogosphere and alternative media and punished websites that have dared to report on such taboo topics as Pizzagate, Wikileaks email dumps, any controversial aspects of the Syrian war and many other serious topics which these agenda-driven companies have opted to suppress.
While these platforms offer the opportunity to reach a wide audience, the centrality of ubiquitous platforms like Facebook, Google and Twitter is, obviously, that they have the power to delete accounts and drive down audience response by tweaking the algorithm.
They can make you invisible.
That is the state of free speech in 2016. It can be eradicated at a moment’s notice, and perhaps for reasons you aren’t even aware of.
shtfplan.com/emergency-preparedness/this-is-the-purge-we-all-knew-was-coming-shutting-down-extremist-content
No comments:
Post a Comment