A lot of people live by the idea it won't happen to them. It's reasonable, a way to cope with many of life's vagaries, kind of a personal comfort zone available to any and all. It's another way of convicting oneself it's the other guy not me. I am one of them, I voted for them, they won't single me out.
Well, if you're currently thinking this won't and isn't happening right now here in America, you're not thinking. This is PC in it's purist sinister form. Right in your face. Diversity is supposed to be about tolerance. This is zero tolerance at its ugliest.
It's also a testimony about just how rigged the system is and how those who want want they want will stop at nothing to get it. They're called elites for a reason.
----
Europe is currently seeing the reintroduction of blasphemy laws
through both the front and back doors. In Britain, the gymnast Louis
Smith has just been suspended for two months by British Gymnastics. This
27-year old sportsman's career has been put on hold, and potentially
ruined, not because of anything to do with athletics but because of
something to do with Islam.
Last month a video emerged online of the four-time Olympic
medal-winner and a friend getting up to drunken antics after a wedding.
The video -- taken on Smith's phone in the early hours of the morning --
showed a friend taking a rug off a wall and doing an imitation of
Islamic prayer rituals. When the video from Smith's phone ended up in
the hands of a newspaper, there was an immediate investigation, press
castigation and public humiliation for the young athlete. Smith -- who
is himself of mixed race -- was forced to parade on daytime television
in Britain and deny that he is a racist, bigot or xenophobe. Notoriously
liberal figures from the UK media queued up to berate him for getting
drunk or for even thinking of taking part in any mockery of religion.
This in a country in which Monty Python's
Life of Brian is regularly voted the nation's favourite comic movie.
After an "investigation," the British sports authority has now deemed Smith's behaviour to warrant a removal of funding and a
two-month ban
from sport. This is the re-entry of blasphemy laws through the back
door, where newspapers, daytime chat-shows and sports authorities decide
between them that one religion is worthy of particular protection. They
do so because they take the religion of Islam uniquely on its own
estimation and believe, as well as fear, the warnings of the Islamic
blasphemy-police worldwide.
The front-door reintroduction of blasphemy laws, meantime, is being
initiated in a country which once prided itself on being among the first
in the world to throw off clerical intrusion into politics. The Dutch
politician Geert Wilders has been put on trial before. In 2010 he was
tried in the courts for the contents of his film "Fitna" as well as a
number of articles. The
trial collapsed
after one of the expert witnesses -- the late, great Dutch scholar of
Islam, Hans Jansen -- revealed that a judge in the case had tried in
private to influence him to change his testimony. The trial was
transparently rigged and made Dutch justice look like that of a tin-pot
dictatorship rather than one of the world's most developed democracies.
The trial was rescheduled and, after considerable legal wrangling,
Wilders was eventually found "not guilty" of a non-crime in 2011.
But it seems that the Dutch legal system, like the Mounties, is intent on always getting its man. On Monday of this week the
latest trial
of Geert Wilders got underway in Holland. This time Wilders is being
tried because of a statement at a rally in front of his supporters in
March 2014. Ahead of municipal elections, and following reports of a
disproportionate amount of crimes being committed in Holland by Muslims
of Moroccan origin, Wilders asked a crowd, "Do you want more or fewer
Moroccans in this city and in the Netherlands?" The audience responded,
"Fewer, fewer." To which Wilders responded, "Well, we'll arrange that,
then."
- Europe is currently seeing
the reintroduction of blasphemy laws through both the front and back
doors, initiated in a country which once prided itself on being among
the first in the world to throw off clerical intrusion into politics.
- By prosecuting Wilders, the courts in Holland are effectively
ruling that there is only one correct answer to the question Wilders
asked. They are saying that if someone asks you whether you would like
more Moroccans or fewer, people must always answer "more," or he will be
committing a crime.
- At no point would it occur to me that anyone saying he did not
want an endless flow of, say, British people coming into the Netherlands
should be prosecuted. Nor would he be.
- The long-term implications for Dutch democracy of criminalising a
majority opinion are catastrophic. But the trial of Wilders is also a
nakedly political move.
- The Dutch courts are behaving like a religious court. They are
trying to regulate public expression and opinion when it comes to the
followers of one religion. In so doing they obviously aspire to keep the
peace in the short term, but they cannot possibly realise what trouble
they are storing up for our future.
gatestoneinstitute.org/9253/europe-blasphemy-courts