END OF CELEBRATION DAY WRAP

There was much celebrating today as the DJIA  eclipsed it all time high of 14,168 last seen in 2009, closing at 14,253.77, up nearly 126 points for the session.

It didn't take long for the celebrators to show up, some singing the praises of the Federal Reserve Bank's QE policies while chastising the ECB for being so slow on the draw. Others, however, were not so giddy including a big-time hedge fund manager who essentially borrowed a line from one of college football's television talking heads.

Not so fast. That's a paraphrase of what the fund guy said, but it's close enough, as in "it's going to end very badly." If true that leaves the questions of when and how badly.

Might want to consider some June or September SPY puts.

To quickly recap the DJIA in 2008 dropped nearly 35% amid the housing market blowup and the Fed started its so-called ride to the rescue. Those 401K plans took huge hits and now with the rally some suggests they're worth more now than the last time the  DJIA traded at 14,000.

Another catalyst, according to some, was the Institute for Supply Management index, jumping to 56 for February, up 0.8 from January. So despite all the wall of worry talk, many market followers focused on the good news.

The S & P 500 closed at 1,539.79, just 25 points off its all-time also made four years ago. The NASDQ likewise enjoyed an up day lead by the technology sector, closing at 3,224.13. Gold also rallied for the second day in a row ending at 1,574.60 an ounce.

RELUCTANT TO SAY

You'll get a bunch of interesting comments when you put on a suit and tie, shine your shoes, grab a microphone and head out to a busy shopping mall accompanied by a camera man to do people-on-the-go interviews.

The first person was an attractive, petite, 40-something Vietnamese lady still dressed in her colorful surgical scrubs.

I asked what in her mind was one of the purposes of computers. She gave it some thought and answered with a question, the same one nearly everyone has: "Make things easier?"

Given her profession I followed that up with how many strokes and heart attacks did she think computers have caused. After all, the frustration level can be off the charts. When will the first law suit, if it hasn't already, be filed? And will it be a big class action one?

You can see the late night infomercial. "If you or anyone you know has suffered a recent heart attack and you or they work with computers, call Skalenny, Skokcroft  and Smith now. You may be entitled to a claim."

Then I asked about her paperwork load, being an RN for 20 years and working two jobs, has it increased or lessened? She just rolled her eyes and smiled. How about trees, has the computer saved any trees and if so how many?

She declined on that one too, again with a smile. So I changed gears a bit and asked her if the legal profession played a role in creating what should be obvious to everyone, the oceans of paper work businesses, large and small, have to deal with everyday in an age of the great computer.

More and more employers today seem to believe or have been sold that more paper work will somehow save them from one of the planet's greediest professions. It doesn't.
More and more businesses today, large and small, seemed to have bought into the idea  that more is really less. It isn't. 

This went on for a while until, to get to the bottom line, I asked where does the demand for all the paper work originate. She wasn't sure. So I offered what I considered was a huge hint--government.

She chuckled a a bit and flashed a brief but bright smile like someone had just tugged on a light bulb string buried deep somewhere in the recesses of her gray matter.

"You know, I have been thinking the same thing for a long time," she said, "but was reluctant to say anything."

In case you don't recognize it, that's pretty much summarizes the American public's stubborn, misplaced willingness to tolerate the pathetic nonsense, right, left or abstained, going on in Washington.

Remain reluctant at your own peril.

THE WEEK AHEAD

The DJIA's all-time high,14,164.53, was on October 9, 2009, the same day the S&P 500 hit an all-time peak,1,565.15. The Dow sits less than one percent off its high while the S&P 500 is rolling around three percent from its all-time high.

Working backwards Friday's about unemployment, expected to stay at 7.8% and 160,000 new jobs, not much over January.  Also on the docket will be SM reaction to $85 billion automatic cuts and their perceived impact on growth after participants had weekend to contemplate. The IMF predicts they will knock 0.5% off US growth in 2013.

Another concern centers on what's truly hoisting stock prices, easy money versus real signs of economic steadying. Each camp has its devotees. It's basically about leadership, growth and small caps versus large caps and value. Some may call it risk-on-risk-off. Just maybe the SM's mimicking the lack of real leadership in Washington.

ONE OF MANY

Here's just one of many possible responses to Mr. Druckenmiller's recent whining about his predicted enchained future for today's youth. Even the king advocate of government spending, John Maynard Keynes, noted that nine of ten times the worst never happens.

One would think a big-time numbers cruncher like Druckenmiller would appreciate that.

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2013/02/28/every-generation-had-it-better-than-us.aspx

MARKET UPDATE

The stock market ended the week up despite the beginning of sequestration kicking in as the President and Congress failed to cut a deal in what's become a source of entertainment world-wide: Will they reach a compromise or won't they? Will they kiss and make up or is this the start of a legal separation?

Many Americans yawned their way through this carnival as the DJIA closed the week at 14,089, up a whopping .64% for the week. It was a similar tale for the NASDQ, up 0.25%, closing at 3,167 and the S&P 500 closing at 1,518.20, up 0.23% for the session.

Retail investors, apparently tired of waiting and tired of paltry returns available in so-called safer stuff, are now filing into the SM, buying the dips and hoping for the best. With a little luck this could be another episode of their buy high-and-sell lower saga Wall Street loves. Without bait there's no fishing.

Meanwhile, back at the sequestration party the market may decide no compromise is a compromise. Financials and consumer discretionary shares shared the upside limelight of what was another sedate session, with Bank of America (BAC) and the GAP (GPS) leading the charge.

HARD TRUTH

We want to be among the the first to say this sequestration ballyhoo will not, as in no way, turn out to be the maelstrom most pundits predict.

To begin with you're dealing with some Washington folks who love to play hardball with other folks' lives. Now both sides face rock-and-hard-spot time where their tried and trite blame game has become little more than a tattoo that won't take. It's older than yesterday's fish-wrapped newspaper.

Next point: "We don't give a damn who blew out the furnace, it's colder than my old girlfriend's heart, let's get the hell outta here!"

Stanley Druckenmiller of hedge fund fame and a former Soros head cheese, recently whined his way though a one hour media interview about seniors bankrupting the nation's youth.

It was another of those pick-on-the-most obvious, usual suspects, social security and Medicare. Let's drive a convenient wedge between those doting old folks whose sweat helped prosper this country and the younger crowd with the inflated college grades and egos about their self-worth. Druckenmiller obliquely threatened to unleash a 40-million throng of kids on Washington one day.

Someone needs to inform Mr. Druckenmiller that's hardly a gathering.  And forget Washington. When the temperatures drop low enough they'll be legions outside those officials' first and second and third homes. Now you're talking some leverage. Take the struggle to them.

It's one of the basic tactics of guerrilla warfare. And in case you don't recognize it, that's what this is--economic guerrilla warfare. Democrats say it's because they didn't get their way. Republicans will say it's because they didn't get their way. And you didn't get your way either, better prospects for a better, safer life. Real wages have been worse than funky for a decade. And real inflation is one of the government's best-dined lies.

Hardcore? Not really. Hard truth? You bet.

HERE'S WHAT REAL DEBT LOOKS LIKE

In honor of the possibility of sequestration beginning today, we post the following link. Park your well-thought out political biases for the nonce and just enjoy the graphics. It's a blue-sky, bright sunny, 70s-day here in the So Cal and we're sitting outside with one of our resident philosophers, a three old multi-pooh who just flashed us the let-the-cutting-begin sign.

And he isn't talking about the lawn. What this economy and its pathetically-inept-agenda-driven leadership needs is something a famous, now deceased football coach noted years ago: "Nothing cleanses the soul like a good, old fashioned ass kicking." We hope we got that verbatim.

Let see who the real wussies are and who taps out first. This is not about right or left. We don't have a greyhound in that race. They're both pitiful. These folks are so short sighted they have to stand tip-toe on the bottom just to try to reach the top of the bottom.


http://demonocracy.info/infographics/usa/us_debt/us_debt.html

TODAY'S UPDATE

Today's update related to another recent post. This one before the next teardrop.

Dropping from $12.8 trillion to $11.4 trillion, especially if consumer debt is again on the rise, hardly seems like a time for glee, notwithstanding the automatic budget cuts set to spin through the economy. But as a colleague used to always say: "Oh, we'll."

Another point to recall is a rising stock market doesn't mean a strong underlying economy. In fact, if and when the economy clearly starts to do better, the SM could surprise and tank. For more go to Random Reads and see "FHA Hits Brakes........"

Household debt in the U.S. climbed 0.3% in the fourth quarter as student and auto loans rose along with credit-card balances, according to a Federal Reserve Bank of New York survey.

Consumer indebtedness rose by $31 billion to $11.34 trillion, according to a quarterly report on household debt and credit released today by the Fed district bank. Non-housing borrowing increased 1.4% to $2.75 trillion, the third straight quarterly advance.

“The report shows some clear signs of healing in consumer debt markets,” James McAndrews, executive vice president and director of research at the New York Fed, said in the text of prepared remarks delivered today in New York. “While it is too soon to conclude that a trend has been established in which households are beginning to increase their debts again, there are signs that the four-year long contraction is slowing.”

The U.S. economy expanded at a 0.1% annual rate during the fourth quarter, according to revised figures released by the Commerce Department today, as stronger consumer spending and a rebound in residential real estate blunted the impact from cuts in military outlays running at a 22% annual pace.

The “recent improvement” in the housing market has been accompanied by the increase in consumer borrowing, and household delinquency rates are continuing to “slowly recover,” McAndrews said. As of year-end, 8.6% of debt was in “some stage of delinquency,” down from 8.9% in the third quarter, the New York Fed’s survey showed.

http://www.futuresmag.com/2013/02/28/new-york-fed-says-household-debt-climbed-03-in-fou?t=financials

INTIMIDATION

The Woodward-Blodget saga will no doubt go on for a while.

It's really a story with two tails, damage control and intimidation, Siamese twins in the twisted, convoluted and corrupt worlds of Wall Street and Washington. Travel there unarmed at your own peril.

The case against Martha Stewart was in our humble opinion way more flimsy than Blodget. But she was a bigger media catch, right up there with Oprah, since they could hold her up and say: "See, we're doing something to get these awful cheaters."

Stewart did nothing more than what dozens of other insiders did and still do and walked. Blodget, despite the size of his fines, was a small-time crook nibbling at the edges of the high grass were he sought and would've loved to go.

Make no mistake this is about intimidation. When Watergate exploded one of the self-righteous themes of the MSM--and we include scabs like Woodward here--was intimidation. The Nixon clan had a hit list that mysteriously went viral before viral was viral. The media outrage was thicker than Karl Rove's waistline.

But if you look carefully you'll have a difficult time finding, with much succor from their MSM friends, administrations more familiar with intimidation tactics than the last two Democrat one.

These are some serious, treacherous, evil folks who if he were around today would have Machiavelli reaching for a helmet and a flak jacket. 

BLODGET TIME

Forget Miller. It's Mr. Henry Mckelvey Blodget time.

Now we have the CEO/Editor of Business Insider, an internet business news and analysis site, and a known lefty and Barrack Obama supporter, Henry Blodget, jumping into the Woodward brouhaha.

Writing a piece for his own site, "Oh, Please, The White House
Didn't 'Threaten' Bob Woodward," Blodget tries to play down Woodward's claim that senior officials at the White House threatened him when he apparently asked the wrong questions.

Blodget, who admitted in his blog that he hadn't seen the video where Woodward reportedly made his claim, did his best to minimize whatever Woodward said, resorting to a wad of PR and journalistic gobble-gook. Otherwise known as journalistic BS. Just what one would expect from a former Yalie who previously portrayed himself as a tech stock expert now apparently views himself as an expert on the cannons of journalism.

It was the usual trite and true, warmed-over attempt to discredit anyone who questions this administration. But here's what you need to know about Mr. Blodget, all a part of the public record.

After college and working as a free lance reporter and later as an editor at Harper's, Blodget found his way to Wall Street where he toiled as a security analyst specializing in tech stocks.

After a few intermediary stops Blodget wound up at Merrill Lynch at the height of the dot.com bubble as a sell-side analyst hawking dot.com stocks to any and all foolish enough to listen. When that bubble finally burst and the blood was running thick in the streets, the now obligatory investigation asking the usual question they always ask, What The Hell Happened? began.

One of the things that happened was computer files about dot.com stocks Blodget was blatantly pushing on the public out of one side of his mouth he was labeling POSs to insiders on his e-mails. His actions hurt a lot of people, make no mistake about that. Of course, like most of these cases, we know he's now sufficiently contrite.

But Blodget did what many of his Wall Street brethren do once the Attorney General of New York came calling: He bought his way out of jail. In 2003 he was charged with securities fraud by the SEC. True to the Wall Street code he agreed to a permanent ban from the securities industry and coughed up a $2 million fine and another $2 million disgorgement, legalese for when one is forced by law to give up profits obtained by unethical, illegal acts.

But it gets better.  Blodget's first writing job after the air cleared was for the left wing rag, Slate, covering the Martha Stewart insider trading trial. But Martha didn't fare quite as well as Henry. She went off to camp in West Virginia for a brief stay.

Meanwhile, you got to hand it to Slate for giving the assignment to Blodget. They obviously recognized a universal truth: It takes one to know one.

One of the things you should also note is throughout this entire blog we never called Mr. Blodget a former crook.