Monday, April 11, 2016

POINTING IT OUT

This is one of those superfluous debates that actually makes an important point. Though the author supports his position quite well, whether he intended to or otherwise, he shows just how big a bubble this thing is.

We think it's a candidate for most maligned market, deservedly so in our view owing to an out of control money printing Fed now aided by many of their global comrades. The need to keep this charade going and the built-in danger grows daily.

Take this chart, for example.
household assets

Why would you want to have any cash in money markets when some now even before inflation and taxes are yielding less than zero? And that's not the only reason MMFs have lost some of their appeal. Safety is another.

http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/570b9f9991058424008bbc14-1057-497/screen%20shot%202016-04-11%20at%208.54.10%20am.png

This next chart we think the author strokes one of those high fastballs over the edge of the plate out of the park. Deep center field. Higher interest  rates when they arrive--and they will arrive-- will catch more than a few looking for something off speed and soft like the Fed's been serving up regularly.

http://static4.businessinsider.com/image/570ba20952bcd01a008bbc85-1031-488/screen%20shot%202016-04-11%20at%208.54.24%20am.png

The above chart speaks for itself. There's a lot of leverage out there.

http://static1.businessinsider.com/image/570b9ef291058425008bbc1e-1327-764/screen%20shot%202016-04-11%20at%208.53.22%20am.png

 This is what we call the fear of missing out chart. To us it helps explain the low cash levels in these funds. Mutual fund money runners are known for their lemming-like characteristics. It's hardly new.

businessinsider.com/stop-calling-this-the-most-hated-bull-market-in-history-2016

We hope you enjoy reading this author's article. We enjoyed pointing it out.

OVERNIGHT

What was once all the rage, Abernomics, now finds itself embroiled in growing investor skepticism as the Nikkei though up slightly in trading Tuesday morning is down 16% so far in 2016 and on course some believe to retrace its 40% gain from 2012 at the start of Abernomics.

Prospects of a weaker U.S. dollar and interest rate hikes at least for now on hold pushed gold higher in New York trading for June delivery at $1258 an ounce. The yellow stuff is up 18% on the year despite the MSM's constant jawboning for yielding nothing to hold it. With negative zero interest rates in Japan, the EU, Sweden and Switzerland, investors in gold seem to be saying such cheap talk is just that.

Meanwhile, oil settled back above $40 a barrel helped out by the weaker dollar. A weaker dollar bodes trouble for Japanese officials as some inflection point might be hit soon, calling for more intervention. Earnings season both in Japan and the U.S. loom over markets also.

Here's an overnight look from Reuters.

TOKYO, April 12 Japan's Nikkei share average rose on Tuesday morning as the dollar gained versus the yen in early morning trade, lifting cyclical stocks such as exporters as well as recently battered banking shares.
Weakness in the dollar kept the market worried after it slumped to a 17-month low of 107.63 yen on Monday but by 0146 GMT on Tuesday, the dollar stood at 108.14 yen.
The Nikkei gained 1.0 percent to 15,903.30 in midmorning trade. The benchmark index has fallen 16 percent this year, while it is retracing about 40 percent of gains since the start of 'Abenomics' in 2012.
Traders said that Japanese equities are swayed by foreign exchange rates, with Japan Inc's last fiscal years' earnings announcements scheduled within a few weeks. Investors will likely start taking positions after companies release their forecasts for this fiscal year, they said.
They added that the Nikkei may stay sluggish until then, as many investors remain sceptical of 'Abenomics."
"Investors are frustrated about the lack of effective measures against the strong yen," said Hikaru Sato, senior technical analyst at Daiwa Securities. "Confidence in Japanese stocks has waned since the end of last year and it still hasn't recovered."
Banking stocks were leading the gains on Tuesday, with Mitsubishi UFJ Financial Group rising 4.8 percent and Mizuho Financial Group gaining 4.2 percent.

LACK OF CONFIDENCE GROWS

We recently wrote about those low rates and the damages they're doing to the COLA-dependent and retirees in general.

 And we noted that bureaucratic monster called the IMF and how their love for negative zero rates and its phony stimulus affect has on the global recovery made no mention of the pain such inflicts on the above. Now, guess what, those money-grubbing, fees-loading big banks are wailing the low-interest rate blues, too.

A WSJ headline,"Banks' Outlook Suffers As Rates Remain Low," tells the story. It turns out financial stocks which as 2016 was starting in what was suppose to be a good time isn't. Hello, Jamie Dimon. Toss in the recently released "Panama Papers" and you have some idea why this year's U.S. presidential election is going to be a most entertaining one. Standup comics, as we've said before, pay attention. There's going to be some hot material here. And for free.

It is also why--though MSM and its minions will never admit it--Trump-traction and the Vermont Socialist are climbing in the races. According to reports, Bernie spent his honeymoon in the old Soviet Union. That's seems like an important qualification for occupying the White Shack.

Bottom line, banks are apparently victims of bureaucratic unintended consequences. First quarter earnings on the big boys start this week. Key is net interest margins, since trading profits are nil or worse owing to regulatory fears and wrist-slapping. Where utilities were the surprised leaders in the first three months, banks have been the market's laggers. Both are interest rates sensitive, but for different reasons.

Banks are suppose to be"fundamental" to the economy. The same can be said for utilities.This is all the more reason to suspect the recent so-called positive data Yellen and her crew celebrated about the U.S. recovery and used it to hold back on raising rates. There are other clouds also hanging over the industry.

European banks and their known troubles are one thing, but markets are now leery of those unknown things owing to the lack of forthrightness afoot today seemingly everywhere. A recent example is those secret IMF documents that were leaked about Greece. There is a danger here and it's a big one.

If this whole bureaucratic-driven financial ball of wax comes unglued, you can bet you won't find any of these over-compensated, benighted bureaucrats pounding their chests for recognition in public after it goes down. By now most probably have those lucrative speaking fees buried somewhere other than Panama. Probably in gold.

A lack of confidence is their worst nightmare. If you think not, just turn your gaze east toward China.



TENTATIVELY MEANINGFUL BUT PROBABLY USELESS

If you're looking for a good reason to know why the International Monetary Fund is dangerous to your financial health and future here it is. The IMF is a bureaucratic mess that symbolizes globalism and everything you should fear about globalism.

It's clear they are flying by the seat of your pants not theirs because you will be the ones to suffer as they work their destruction. It's should also be clear they have not a clue at this stage of what will and what will not work. This is a cold, indifferent, secretive clutch of bureaucrats with way too much power that should be disbanded.

Though they admit having little experience with negative interest rates, they "tentatively conclude that overall they help deliver additional monetary stimulus and easier financial conditions." Note too the phrase "probably supported stronger economic growth."

Tentatively and probably are two of the best hedge or CYA  terms in the entire lexicon of bureaucratic gobbledygook.You should also question the timing of this nonsense just before this big circus rolls into Washington this week and MSM will fall all over itself to spread their gospel.

We have a suggestion. Maybe these bureaucratic wonders should tentatively pick up their paychecks every payday, but probably never cash them.

Washington (AFP) - The IMF on Sunday defended negative interest rates set by central banks, given "significant risks" of slow growth, while acknowledging potential for dangerous boom-and-bust cycles.
Six central banks, notably the European Central Bank and the Bank of Japan, have taken the unprecedented measure, aimed at loosening the reins on credit to help spur consumer spending and investment.
"Although the experience with negative nominal interest rates is limited, we tentatively conclude that overall they help deliver additional monetary stimulus and easier financial conditions," three top officials at the International Monetary Fund wrote in a blog. 
It comes ahead of the IMF's annual Spring Meetings this week in Washington.
In mid-March, IMF Managing Director Christine Lagarde said that the unorthodox negative short-term rates, in which commercial banks pay central banks to hold their money, had probably supported stronger economic growth.
While in theory the concept should work, economists are closely studying what happens in Europe and Japan amid worries that negative rates could actually provoke businesses and consumers to be more cautious about spending.
The three IMF officials also had words of caution.
"Negative interest rates may induce boom and bust cycles in asset prices. These potential risks require close monitoring and supervisory scrutiny," they said.

Sunday, April 10, 2016

IT'S THE MARKETS, JAKE!

https://encrypted-tbn1.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQjVHRNveq8QjN-V_5h1tyhKjOtUSgcMOZAk9t6HI--cGxsKPMq
What is Asia's best performing currency? The answer is the same one up 11% through last week  against the U.S. dollar--the Japanese yen.

Like a lot of things, that wasn't suppose to happen. To paraphrase a line from a classic film, some might conclude: "It's the markets, Jake!" Japanese officials--Abernomics, in short--have been twisting their monetary spigot open for so long with such force their hands should be fatigued if not their resolve.

Don't get confused, the markets get moved by what some call external factors. But Japanese officials have not been reluctant to intervene to soften the yen. And the recent and surprising reversal of the Federal Reserve's posture hasn't helped Japanese officials. In fact, it's more of a clear sign central bankers are focused on China and it's problems.

Meanwhile, investors and market pundits are being forced to refocus on they're expectations for the yen in 2016. The European bank situation isn't helping either. Higher U.S. rates would've provided some cushion for the yen, relieving some of it's pressure as a safe haven stop for concerned investors.
That could still happen, but perception often trumps an actual dose of reality down the road.

And that raises another question: What if any validity does negative interest rates strategy have left with investors?  Covenants in the trans-Pacific trade agreement reportedly forbid a nation from weakening its currency to improve its trade. Though agreements hardly are written in stone at meetings like the recent G20 when officials return home, industrial and developing nations at the recent gathering in February agreed not to start a currency war if growth slows further.

If we had to guess, we think the yen's rise might go through a brief head fake owing to the above before going higher. Maybe even much higher. Like we said above: "It's the markets, Jake," And it wasn't suppose to happen.



OVERNIGHT

Dollar down, yen up.

If that sounds like a parlor game, it isn't. As noted last week the U.S. dollar fell to a 17 month low against the yen and Japanese stocks took their early Monday cue from the currency markets.

Meanwhile, the WSJ reported: China shares jumped Monday amid expectations that soft inflation leaves room for authorities to stimulate the economy through further monetary easing.
The Shanghai Composite Index was up 1.8% at 3038.78.
But in Japan, where the yen touched a fresh high against the U.S. dollar, the Nikkei Stock Average fell by 1.3%.
Shares in China and Japan have diverged markedly in performance over the past one-month period, as the People’s Bank of China and Bank of Japan face starkly different challenges.
Investors and analysts believe that China’s central bank has ample tools to ease policy, including potentially cutting interest rates, but that Japanese officials are running short of options, after already moving to negative interest rates earlier this year.
Data Monday showed Chinese consumer inflation rising 2.3% in March from a year earlier, the same as February’s tally and remaining below the government’s target ceiling.
Other data released Monday showed Japan's core machinery orders dropped 9.2% in February from the previous month adding to concerns about the lack of recovery in the light of Japanese official attempts to stimulate growth. The prospect of a stronger yen also weighs heavy on Japanese exports.

The next unknown is when or if the BOJ will take any further action to offset the rising yen, unlike in China where investors seem to think officials there have further room to tackle their situation.




Saturday, April 9, 2016

THE BOND GURU

http://specials-images.forbesimg.com/imageserve/0gr15a6gic4ue/0x600.jpg?fit=scale&background=000000
It's nice of bond guru Bill Gross to finally come out and say that ultra low interest rates are killing folks. Most likely after he's made tons of money off them.

It's nice of the Butler Creek boy to say what others have been saying for some time now. Who are these others? Mostly the voiceless. But here's an example--anyone on a COLA. Like maybe your 87-year-old grandmother those politicians who care so much about and want her vote this November.

And what savers? Is that term still in the lexicon of most people? It's been reported that Japanese investors are moving funds to the U.S. because they find the zero return rates on cash attractive. We know you do too. We also know that those rates are somewhat responsible for gold's recent upswing, zero yield.

In the land of the poor-sighted, the one-eyed guy is king. Who doesn't understand that zero  outperforms minus zero? Gross apparently has some Chuck Schumer lineage in him. Any opportunity for publicity is a good one, so he dons the cover of this week's Barron's. No, we're not knocking Gross' smarts. Like we said, he's smart enough to know when to keep quiet about an investment and when to open the flood gates.

He makes an interesting point about volatility, every retail investors'--including the February Japan and China sell off--worst fear. There's really three kinds--upside, downside and flat. All can be used to make money. He says volatility--at least right now--has the lowest risk relative to the return on the others such as credit., currency and liquidity. If you don't know and have some understanding of these, forget the market. Take up sports betting. The bookies will love you.

The average retail investor usually doesn't realize what he and she is buying and selling. It's not just a stock or bond or earnings or P/E or whatever. That's the financial gobbledygook they want you to buy into. It's buying and selling disappointment. If what he thinks will happen happens, someone else is disappointed. And just the reverse. Can credit ratings ever disappoint? Yes. How about liquidity?

We had this really attractive girlfriend recently who was a neurotic nightmare. We had to evict her to get rid of her. That can be a real illiquid situation .So you know the answer to liquidity, it can really disappoint. The same goes for earnings, analysts' reports, and here's an even more certain one, predictions of economists.

We apologize. We omitted another big one--promises of politicians.

What Gross is intelligently saying here is central bankers won't any time soon be adorning the face of your currency with inscription of: In Central Bankers We Trust. Now don't take our word for it.This is Bill Gross, the bond guru.



ASSUMING FREEDOM TO DO SO

What the Trump candidacy represents to many of his detractors is a form of protectionism, globalists' worst nightmare. At least that's what their argument to derail him is now.

Buried in that term is most of the other well-chosen epithets like xenophobe, racist, homophobe, hater and so on.

What Breixt, the upcoming UK election to go or stay in the EU, represents is a form of protectionism. As so does Grexit. Protectionism is also about sovereignty, preserving one's culture, one's currency, privacy and, in the eyes of many, liberty, all things globalists disdain. Some call it simply local rule.

So the elitists and their MSM lackeys paint it as all bad. But is it? It's a form of self-determination, what the phony right to vote is suppose to be about. In the U.S. you have two parties that say: "Here, go out and vote, pick from one of our candidates and everything will be fine."

And so it will until voters pick one candidate party aprachits don't like. And that brings us back to Trump and the perceived but false threat of protectionism and a brokered convention. It also tells us why this two party monopoly is broke.

The tremors you've been feeling are from a fault all right but not the geological kind. It's the major fault of these two bankrupt parties that for decades have been serving at best 10 percent of the people. You're enfranchised, to be sure, so long as you play by their rules.

Protectionism is like sunshine, a little bit can't be all bad. Who gets to define a little bit? Well, whose been deciding what candidates you get to vote for in these jokes called presidential primaries? The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, CNN or Fox News? It certainly isn't you. Nor are brokered conventions or their threat new.

Local and any talk of it is a globalist's second worse nightmare. They despise terms like local, liberty, self-determination, soverignty, cultural, freedom of expression. And their disdain is all cloaked in their fake meme about revering and celebrating diversity. They don't. The term globalist itself is anti-diverse. It is also anti-language. So what's going to be the language of the globe, a Western or an Eastern one? And what happens to all the others? How free is a cashless society? Sounds pretty anti-diverse to us.

Who are the real xenophobes here, the real villains? You, me, them? That's something you'll have to decide for yourself, assuming you have any freedom left to do so when the time comes?

Friday, April 8, 2016

A CUTE PARTY

 https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTzhcIAPuJOwfAWu5KcWSGiyYCUOv3bz9viw_k3cVxwNhmTNRqgeg
Ever go to a cute party?

Cute parties are always staged. And we just got treated to one that could not have been more staged. The hosts were hand selected, a couple of Democrats, a couple of Republicans, all economists, all former chief central bankers.

It was an economic play on good cop-bad cop with one slight twist: there was no really, really bad guy just another shill for their main theme who played the role of lighthouse keeper--things are fine but here's a reminder. There are some shoals out there. He's a Republican, but he's wizen and wise, two reassuring traits, to be sure, speaking the word of calm caution. That should soothe some frayed rabble nerves.

 The MSM, true to it charter, jumped on this fantasy like a gaggle of obese sports journalists during a half-time free spread at the Super Bowl. Free food? You mean there's more. Rumor has it most of them double their Metformin dose that day. You can bet a week's supply of your favorite anxiolytic stash big pharma loves it.

You wonder who thought up this obvious attempt to settle the masses down by parading four people with central bank experience, economically and gender PC, a sham if there ever was one. What it tells you, like the Trump unexpected, much parodied ascendancy, real or not, they're scared, threatened to the bone. There's trouble in paradise, not your or mine--theirs.

But let's examine a bit this cast of well-chosen characters rooted out at this particular inflection point. You have a couple of blasts from the past beginning with the guy who's credited in the early 1980s with breaking inflation's spine. You also have the long-too-long standing Mr. Irrational Exuberance, Sir Alan, who in a book about the Maestro Man by that Bob Woodward openly admitted he delighted in flummoxing the media.

More recently, the astute academician who in his spare time likes to fly helicopters. He's best remembered for staring the world in the kisser and reassuring us all the subprime miasma was "well contained." The was before it imploded. Nobody saw much of him after because reports have it he's too busy going around collecting hundreds of thousands for speeches and hobnobbing with the hedge fund crowd.

And last but not least, you have the current anointed bureaucrat who spends thirty seconds of every minute going backwards and thirty seconds of every minute going forward, a dove in dove's clothing.She's not really confused, just occasionally looks like it--all day everyday. She's been waiting for clearer signs longer than many playgoers have been waiting for Godot. If you don't smell the scent of a staged event, here's a message for you: You can't afford to buy the Brooklyn Bridge.








ARROGANCE AND CONTEMPT

https://encrypted-tbn3.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcTaAktoW2OZ78TGJMl8WFgrn6CNot6BG6zgpAWcfnt0fdD3drWU6g
People who write about the prospect of bad news are usually about as welcome as bad news at a wedding celebration.

And when a GOP card carrying WSJ columnist ends her long lament about the Trump train's traction with voters by referring to "these two great parties," you know the political seas are getting rough in political paradise.

The only thing great about these two political parties is how long they've managed to bamboozle a Rip Van Winkle public trying to carve its way into what was always an uphill and now nearly impossible struggle to find their place in the middle class. Some incorrectly call this the inequality gap.That's a huge misnomer. In truth, it's a pogrom.

Getting to the middle class was an accomplishment. It gave people a sense of belonging and direction. It was about improving the breed. If not them, maybe their children could go even higher. There was a gap alright, but one middle class people knew about, even upper middle class ones, and they knew how to deal with it.

Once you wipe them out, however, cut off all possibilities of working your way there, it's over and you have what's left now, a chasm not a gap. The number of immigrants who came here, many poorer than church rodents, worked hard to reach that middle class status and nearly everyone one of them earned it. That's people. You're always going to have members of the shortcut crowd, too. That's people.

They often wind up on Wall Street or as bureaucrats in political positions seeking political power so they can tell the rest us how we should live and carry ourselves. They have names, too. Republicans and Democrats, demagogues,tyrants and elitists, members of the self-perpetuating two party system that Journal writer so nostalgically adores and wants to preserve. She, too, is an elitist, perched on her self-serving but condescending editorial throne, ever ready to tell the rest of us how we should  tie our shoes every morning.

She knows what's best. And that's these two "great parties" that have not served more than 10 percent of the people for decades. These two great self-perpetuating parties that in reality are part of the so-called one percent. Show us a Congress person who been there more than two terms and we'll show you someone out of touch and rich.

The real truth is they're the same. A long time ago a guy once noted there's not a dimes worth of difference. Well, there's is. Notwithstanding what central bankers want to tell you, there's been inflation, a lot of it. Nobody wants a dime these days.That's the only difference. They need that and much more just to exist.

The Trumpster man, hate him or otherwise, stated when he got out of the the University of Pennsylvania's School of Finance in 1968, he was worth $200,000. Whether it was daddy's money or not isn't the point. Someone bothered to calculated that out a few years back and it was worth well over $1,200,000 in today's dollars.That's what your central bankers and bureaucrats and so-called elected officials have done for you.

Some call it purchasing power and the loss thereof. That's a kind term. Broad daylight stick-up of the people is a more accurate one.

Toss in the relentless stealth taxing and smothering regulations in 50 different ways of that-dream-to-make-it-to the middle class crowd and you're ready for the official requiem that never got held. That's what the two-party system that feels that garrote tightening around its status quo gullet is shaking in their Armani suits about. That's what these "two great parties" with their military-industrial complex and wasteful social program schemes have created for you. 

Their indifference to the once respectable goal of becoming middle class has been exceeded only by their arrogance and contempt. They love their place at an already over crowded public trough. What they despise, however, is your trying to get yours.