ASSUMING FREEDOM TO DO SO

What the Trump candidacy represents to many of his detractors is a form of protectionism, globalists' worst nightmare. At least that's what their argument to derail him is now.

Buried in that term is most of the other well-chosen epithets like xenophobe, racist, homophobe, hater and so on.

What Breixt, the upcoming UK election to go or stay in the EU, represents is a form of protectionism. As so does Grexit. Protectionism is also about sovereignty, preserving one's culture, one's currency, privacy and, in the eyes of many, liberty, all things globalists disdain. Some call it simply local rule.

So the elitists and their MSM lackeys paint it as all bad. But is it? It's a form of self-determination, what the phony right to vote is suppose to be about. In the U.S. you have two parties that say: "Here, go out and vote, pick from one of our candidates and everything will be fine."

And so it will until voters pick one candidate party aprachits don't like. And that brings us back to Trump and the perceived but false threat of protectionism and a brokered convention. It also tells us why this two party monopoly is broke.

The tremors you've been feeling are from a fault all right but not the geological kind. It's the major fault of these two bankrupt parties that for decades have been serving at best 10 percent of the people. You're enfranchised, to be sure, so long as you play by their rules.

Protectionism is like sunshine, a little bit can't be all bad. Who gets to define a little bit? Well, whose been deciding what candidates you get to vote for in these jokes called presidential primaries? The New York Times, The Wall Street Journal, CNN or Fox News? It certainly isn't you. Nor are brokered conventions or their threat new.

Local and any talk of it is a globalist's second worse nightmare. They despise terms like local, liberty, self-determination, soverignty, cultural, freedom of expression. And their disdain is all cloaked in their fake meme about revering and celebrating diversity. They don't. The term globalist itself is anti-diverse. It is also anti-language. So what's going to be the language of the globe, a Western or an Eastern one? And what happens to all the others? How free is a cashless society? Sounds pretty anti-diverse to us.

Who are the real xenophobes here, the real villains? You, me, them? That's something you'll have to decide for yourself, assuming you have any freedom left to do so when the time comes?