Without villains there's no need for heroes.
Like heroes, vaccine manufactures need villains. And they found one late in 2015 when the propaganda presses cranked up the ink on their latest future revenue ticket, the dreaded Zika virus.
Don't look now but there are at least four companies and the CDC working on Zika vaccine. With that kind of reaction one would think this is a deadly epidemic killing people off en mass.
Yet the number of deaths owing to the virus--and that number itself is problematic, to use a kind term-- is infinitesimal with a capital I. Granted, one death is one too many. With seven billion folks on the planet, however, and a mandatory vaccination for each, that's some big bucks worth chasing, especially if it's government funded with your money.
These vaccines are like these giant billion dollar sports complexes, nearly all of them get funded with some of your money without your consent. Now if these money grubbers could just come up with a vaccine that cuts highway auto accident deaths by half that would be worth the expense. The Zika scare is a hoax. Besides apple pie and the Fourth of July what could be purer than saving pregnant moms and their babies?
As the cited article below points out, the U.S. has 25,000 babies born annually with microcephaly and has had long before anyone in the public sector ever heard the term Zika. But par for the course in February this administration jumped on the panic button, requesting 1.9 billion dollars to study the situation and to develop a Zika vaccine. [17]. It helps to have friends in high places.
In the almost 70 years since the Zika virus was patented by the Rockefeller Foundation, [1] no one ever noticed any association between Zika infection of pregnant women and their babies being born with abnormally small heads or with defects in brain development. But in 2015, we were suddenly made aware of this supposed problem. This claim, based on nothing more than circumstantial evidence, was the beginning point for the propaganda campaign. A propaganda claim doesn’t need to be true; it just needs to be repeated over and over again until people believe it is true.
There is one key point that I want to bring forward from the previous article concerning the number of babies born with microcephaly. First we heard that there were some 4,783 cases of microcephaly in Brazil. After the initial shock and panic was produced, we learned that further investigation showed that the number of confirmed cases was only 483.
The mainstream media also didn’t mention that the number of babies born in the United States with microcephaly in a typical year is 25,000. When adjusting for population differences between the US and Brazil, we find that the rate of microcephaly in the US is actually 40 times higher than the rate in Brazil.
In other words, the US microcephaly incidence is much higher than Brazil, and our babies didn’t get it from Zika. Maybe our babies got it from the various potential causes I discussed in my previous article.
I should also state that the researchers who put their names on this article are all employees of the CDC. [20] I must question whether their analysis was truly objective and whether their findings were influenced by CDC ties to Big Pharma. [21]
In the past several years we've had avian flu, pig flu,West Nile virus and Ebola. It takes several years to develop a vaccine. So keeping them on the front news burner is important to getting funds.Though Zika might upstage it, now you can most likely get prepared for another scare about the avian flu. This discovery occurred two days ago, according to news reports.
The U.S. Department of Agriculture has detected a devastating strain of avian flu in a wild mallard duck in a state refuge in Fairbanks, Alaska.
The strain, H5N2, is the same type of avian flu that affected more than 50 million chickens and turkeys in 15 different states last year, causing U.S. poultry exporters to lose millions of dollars because some of the countries halted all imports from the U.S.
If it bleeds it leads is not the only MSM ploy. Hysteria sells well, too. Now this. On August 26, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) released a report regarding the alleged sexual transmission of the Zika virus by a man who displayed no symptoms of the disease before or after having intercourse with his female partner, who subsequently contracted the disease.
The case involved a Maryland man who had traveled to the Dominican Republic – a country where a Zika outbreak is underway – but who showed no signs of the disease when he returned and engaged in unprotected sex with his partner.
The woman had not traveled to any Zika-infested areas, and the CDC is claiming that the case is the first of its kind – at least in the United States – in which a seemingly uninfected person transmitted the disease through sexual activity.
Although doctors say that this type of transmission is extremely rare, the CDC report – which has been dutifully covered by the Associated Press – is likely to only heighten the paranoia regarding the Zika virus.
In fact, it's not too difficult to imagine a scenario in the near future where sexual intercourse involving those infected by Zika is made illegal by government authorities, similar to laws created in response to the spread of HIV/AIDS.
In the literature for years about transmission of Hepatitis C sexual risk of transmission was listed at one percent by authorities. We challenge those authorities to show us statistics on confirmed cases where the virus was spread sexually in healthy non-intravenous drug using addicts.
Distraction works.
healthimpactnews.com/2016/zika-a-masterpiece-of-public-mind-control
No comments:
Post a Comment