We said in Welcome To The Global Party that we were about a half nuclear block away from WW III, a topic we've been discussing for quite a while now. You don't have to see because you can feel the pieces being put into place by the Necon crowd at places like the Wall Street Journal, the New York Times, the Washington Post and many others.
Earlier today Russian official were told to bring any children they have studying in foreign countries home.
And the biggest Neocon of all, Queen Hillary, with her no-fly zone ranting and her horrible track record of bringing chaos and destruction in the guise of spreading a pony form of democracy just about has us there. Now you have the mighty Lame Duckling threatening to retaliate against Russian hacking that they have no real proof only emotional appeal to substantiate their claims. Wake up people.
Wish I could say things were improving between the US and Russia but they aren't. They're rapidly worsening.
There’s so much happening right now, I can only provide a summary of a few of the more interesting and worrying developments.
This report builds on those I've released over the past two years and begins with a chilling editorial put out by the NY Times on September 29th, 2016, which further demonized Putin specifically, Russia generally, and openly advocates for military confrontation.
Hey, we’ve been down this path before. The deeply conflicted NY Times has never met a war in the Middle East it didn’t support, and has never had any trouble repeating war plan talking points (that always neatly align with those put out by neocon think tanks) or even printing obviously fake “intelligence” from unnamed sources such as that used to justify the illegal US attack and invasion of Iraq.
As a reminder for my US readers who many only have read US press sources on the matter, prior to being attacked Iraq had never threatened the US, had no role in 9/11, and had allowed extensive UN access to its country’s military bases none of which ever showed the slightest trace of manufacturing weapons of mass destruction. And, even if they had been producing these so-called weapons of mass destruction (weapons which are also owned and maintained in the US, for the record), there was still no legal case for an attack by the US because pre-emptive attacks are not justifiable, ever.
What the NY Times has done, again, I fear, is served as a conduit for neocon talking points and therefore has become a propaganda arm readying the US population for another war, this one with Russia. This is a very disturbing development.
Here’s the editorial, into which I have inserted comments where appropriate [in brackets]. Remember, propaganda is designed to elicit core emotional responses such as fear, anger, moral indignation, and a sense of threat to one’s very survival:
peakprosperity.com/blog/102294/do-we-really-want-war-russia
No comments:
Post a Comment