For sometime many people believed the neocons were all on the right. You should notice in this article the part about the New York Times never meeting a war they didn't support. And you should also know by now that the Times is a huge front runner for Hillary and her gang of thugs.
Th elites are made up of neocons, right, left, over the fence or on the backstairs. That's the ploy. Get the masses to think they have a say, a choice. So they wave a rigged ballot box in front of you, and send you home thinking you've expressed yourself in a meaningful way. Now just line up and follow our know-best-for-the-globe lead.
Have they ever found those WMDs? Has anyone gone to jail or even been prosecuted for that huge lie? Colin Powell went to the UN, gave a rousing speech about it. We haven't heard from old Colin of late except about some extra-curricular activity of a certain former politician. Now the Russians, so they tell us, have hacked into the DNC emails and so forth. Such a vile, anger-provoking underhanded deed.
Actually, that's the real reason the Russians were hacking into the DNC emails, to steal that ex-politician's secret for dicking all those young chicks. Success breeds envy, make no mistake. It's part of the capitalistic system. Step on my blue suede shoes, nuke my backyard, but don't screw with my barbecue ribs and pussy. That's a pretty risky reason to risk WWIII over, however. So the powers that rule made up the WikiLeaks' Russian hacking story to block Hillary.
----
I wish I could say things were improving between the US and Russia but they aren't. They're rapidly worsening.
There’s so much happening right now, I can only provide a summary of a few of the more interesting and worrying developments.
This report builds on those I've released over the past two years and begins with a chilling editorial put out by the NY Times on September 29th, 2016, which further demonized Putin specifically, Russia generally, and openly advocates for military confrontation.
Hey, we’ve been down this path before. The deeply conflicted NY Times has never met a war in the Middle East it didn’t support, and has never had any trouble repeating war plan talking points (that always neatly align with those put out by neocon think tanks) or even printing obviously fake “intelligence” from unnamed sources such as that used to justify the illegal US attack and invasion of Iraq.
As a reminder for my US readers who many only have read US press sources on the matter, prior to being attacked Iraq had never threatened the US, had no role in 9/11, and had allowed extensive UN access to its country’s military bases none of which ever showed the slightest trace of manufacturing weapons of mass destruction. And, even if they had been producing these so-called weapons of mass destruction (weapons which are also owned and maintained in the US, for the record), there was still no legal case for an attack by the US because pre-emptive attacks are not justifiable, ever.
What the NY Times has done, again, I fear, is served as a conduit for neocon talking points and therefore has become a propaganda arm readying the US population for another war, this one with Russia. This is a very disturbing development.
Here’s the editorial, into which I have inserted comments where appropriate [in brackets]. Remember, propaganda is designed to elicit core emotional responses such as fear, anger, moral indignation, and a sense of threat to one’s very survival.
Vladimir Putin’s Outlaw State
Sept 29, 2016
President Vladimir Putin is fast turning Russia into an outlaw nation. As one of five permanent members of the United Nations Security Council, his country shares a special responsibility to uphold international law. Yet, his behavior in Ukraine and Syria violates not only the rules intended to promote peace instead of conflict, but also common human decency.
[Which “rules intended to promote peace” is the NY Times referring to here? The same sorts of rules that led NATO to bomb Libya back into the stone age? Or are these the “rules” that allow a country to manufacture fake evidence on Iraq and then attack that country unleashing a decade of bitter sectarian violence? Also, how does “common human decency fit into that schema? I’m truly curious.]
This bitter truth was driven home twice on Wednesday. An investigative team led by the Netherlands concluded that the surface-to-air missile system that shot down a Malaysia Airlines plane over Ukraine in July 2014, killing 298 on board, was sent from Russia to Russian-backed separatists and returned to Russia the same night.
[The MH-17 disaster is anything but clear-cut and the JIT investigation was heavily compromised from the start. Nothing like the claim being made here is supported by the actual investigation evidence presented. This is pure, unsupported speculation at this stage. More on this at a later date.]
More: peakprosperity.com/blog/102294/do-we-really-want-war-russia
No comments:
Post a Comment