We Call It Tolerance

They say a leopard never changes it's spots.

Any pretense that, as this story notes, the New York Times is about to change its policy and turn to "honest reporting" would rival the recent Trump upset. It ain't going to happen. Nobody does fumigation projects that large.

zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-12/liberal-media-turns-itself-nyt-promoses-rededicate-itself-honest-reporting

The liberal stench emanating from the Times is as ingrained as corruption at the DNC and George Soros' DNA. All the news fit to print has always been all the news fit to corrupt. Let's be honest, however indelicate it might sound, something the Times has never been: people in this nation hate each other. And it ain't going away anytime soon. The recent election, split right down the middle, and it's aftermath proves it, though it's something PC has helped create and does its damnedest to try to cover up. This sounds more like a plea to subscribers and advertisers to not leave us.

To our readers,

When the biggest political story of the year reached a dramatic and unexpected climax late Tuesday night, our newsroom turned on a dime and did what it has done for nearly two years — cover the 2016 election with agility and creativity.

After such an erratic and unpredictable election there are inevitable questions: Did Donald Trump’s sheer unconventionality lead us and other news outlets to underestimate his support among American voters? What forces and strains in America drove this divisive election and outcome? Most important, how will a president who remains a largely enigmatic figure actually govern when he takes office? 

As we reflect on this week’s momentous result, and the months of reporting and polling that preceded it, we aim to rededicate ourselves to the fundamental mission of Times journalism. That is to report America and the world honestly, without fear or favor, striving always to understand and reflect all political perspectives and life experiences in the stories that we bring to you. It is also to hold power to account, impartially and unflinchingly. We believe we reported on both candidates fairly during the presidential campaign. You can rely on The New York Times to bring the same fairness, the same level of scrutiny, the same independence to our coverage of the new president and his team.

We cannot deliver the independent, original journalism for which we are known without the loyalty of our subscribers. We want to take this opportunity, on behalf of all Times journalists, to thank you for that loyalty.

Sincerely,

Arthur O. Sulzberger Jr.
Publisher

Dean Baquet
Executive Editor

When everyone gets a trophy, it means no one has learned how to lose gracefully. PC damn near accomplished what its creators set out to do--outlaw dissent, all dissent. Zero tolerance. This election changed all that. Not because of Trump. He was simply the messenger. He never fathered the movement, simply recognized it. One Hundred Sixty million voted, split right down the middle, and 55 million said they ain't taking your PC Hollywood, bicoastal BS anymore. And that goes for the tech heads in SV.

No, there were not all redneck white males. And even if they were it doesn't matter. PC has no boundaries, no limits. Nor were they all ignoramuses. What pissed the PC crowd off many of them had college degrees from Land Grant schools, not the Ivy League pedigree kind, one of the crumbs elites tossed the masses nearly 200 hundred years ago. And some of them, God forbid, could read, write, spell and even add up. Aw shit! That's some guaranteed trouble, folks in Flyover Land with those skills.

But it wasn't just Flyover Land as any post-election map of the country will show. People want to live out their lives in their own way without trampling on anyone else or being trampled on. It's not a new concept. And it's hardly racist, xenophobic or anything else. It's the only good life, live and let live. Something these two bankrupt lobbyist-owned political parties completely disavow.

The Times is historically one of the biggest hate-spreading mongers in the history of journalism.
Yes, journalism has it's history. This is hardly unique to America. It's a global phenomenon and it's growing. That's why so many elite cages are being rattled. And no amount of elite crumb tossing to the rabble is going to change this. Populism is a BS academic pejorative for anyone who differs with you, a pure abstract they use to label and defame.

There's another story making the rounds, zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-12/real-civil-war-possible,
an unwelcome subject for many reasons but nevertheless a valid one. Right, neither the democrats nor the republicans, won this election because many millions are no longer going to be PC'd into silence. We don't support the Bernie Sanders' crowd, but there little denying they got screwed without getting to even take their clothes off. And there's little doubt the Times played a role as obviously did other members of the so-called Fourth Estate. You might call that politics. We call it disenfranchising corruption.

Crazy old Bernie had a right to be heard as did his millions of followers.You can call that what you want. We call it tolerance.