Oh my heavens (Can you say that anymore?), this is the worse news. The fake nation Australia just cut its fake contributions to the fake Clinton Foundation. One can only wonder what the fake Washington Post will fake about such a fake tragedy.
We're going to change that to: Holy fake! Before we go any further, however, we feel a disclaimer is necessary. As noted below we got this story from the fake zerohedge.com news that just today was named a fake news site by the long standing fake Washington Post. That reminds of an old saying: "It takes one to know one."
For months we've been told that the Clinton Foundation, and it's various subsidiaries, were simple, innocent "charitable" organizations, despite the mountain of WikiLeaks evidence suggesting rampant pay-to-play scandals surrounding a uranium deal with Russia and earthquake recovery efforts in Haiti, among others. Well, if that is, in fact, true perhaps the Clintons could explain why wealthy foreign governments, like Australia and Norway, are suddenly slashing their contributions just as Hillary's schedule has been freed up to focus exclusively on her charity work. Surely, these foreign governments weren't just contributing to the Clinton Foundation in hopes of currying favor with the future President of the United States, were they? Can't be, only an useless, "alt-right," Putin-progranda-pushing, fake news source could possibly draw such a conclusion.
Alas, no matter the cause, according to news.com.au, the fact is that after contributing $88mm to the Clinton Foundation, and its various affiliates, over the past 10 years the country of Australia has decided to cease future donations to the foundation just weeks after Hillary's stunning loss on November 4th.
zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/australia-joins-norway-it-cuts-clinton-foundation-donations
News.com.au confirmed Australia's decision to cut future donations to the Clinton Foundation earlier today. When asked why donations were being cut off now, a Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade official simply said that the Clinton Foundation has “a proven track record” in helping developing countries. While that sounds nice, doesn't it seem counterintuitive that these countries would pull their funding just as Hillary has been freed up to spend 100% of her time helping people in developing countries?
----
The above picture was snapped immediately after Hillary learned she lost the election. She was so surprised she had to fake here reaction: "What a faking mess? What happened to all those fake voters George promised?"
zerohedge.com/news/2016-11-25/australia-joins-norway-it-cuts-clinton-foundation-donations
News.com.au confirmed Australia's decision to cut future donations to the Clinton Foundation earlier today. When asked why donations were being cut off now, a Department of Foreign Affairs and Trade official simply said that the Clinton Foundation has “a proven track record” in helping developing countries. While that sounds nice, doesn't it seem counterintuitive that these countries would pull their funding just as Hillary has been freed up to spend 100% of her time helping people in developing countries?
----
The above picture was snapped immediately after Hillary learned she lost the election. She was so surprised she had to fake here reaction: "What a faking mess? What happened to all those fake voters George promised?"
No comments:
Post a Comment