Here's an interesting chart that you might want to look over.
We've talked about stagflation before and a host of other possibilities. We've also said and we will say it again, if you, as this article correctly points out, have any hope of changing the existing corrupt disorder, you can not give up whatever leverage you've gained and you cannot settle for the same old crumb tossing elitist techniques to keep you quiet.
Do we control the slide into disorder and the emergence of a new order? The short answer is no: the forces at work are systemic and structural, and not controllable with the usual political/economic tools.
We've talked about stagflation before and a host of other possibilities. We've also said and we will say it again, if you, as this article correctly points out, have any hope of changing the existing corrupt disorder, you can not give up whatever leverage you've gained and you cannot settle for the same old crumb tossing elitist techniques to keep you quiet.
It
becomes increasingly difficult to believe central planning policy
tweaks can ensure a permanent extension of cooperation and prosperity.
Mao Zedong supposedly said, "There is great disorder under the Heavens and the situation is excellent." For those seeking to replace the existing social and economic order, chaos is a good first step. Those with a stake in the system decaying into disorder feel differently: for them, disorder is threatening and frightening.
Do we control the slide into disorder and the emergence of a new order? The short answer is no: the forces at work are systemic and structural, and not controllable with the usual political/economic tools.
Historian Peter Turchin explores historical cycles of social disintegration and integration in his new book Ages of Discord.
Turchin proposes a model of rising discord that eventually leads to a new cycle of cooperation and
compares the expected result with historical data. He finds 25-year
cycles that combine into roughly 50-year cycles, comparable (though not
identical with) Kondratieff's proposed economic cycles (see chart
below).
These 50-year cycles are part of longer 150 to 200-year cycles that move
from cooperation through an age of discord and disintegration to a new
era of cooperation.
This work draws upon his previous books, including War and Peace and War: The Rise and Fall of Empires, which I referenced in Following in Ancient Rome's Footsteps: Moral Decay, Rising Wealth Inequality (September 30, 2015) and The Lesson of Empires: Once Privilege Limits Social Mobility, Collapse Is Inevitable (April 18, 2016).
These long cycles parallel the cyclical analysis of David Hackett Fischer, whose masterwork The Great Wave: Price Revolutions and the Rhythm of History I've referenced many times over the years, most recently in We've Entered an Era of Rising Instability and Uncertainty (July 18, 2016).
charleshughsmith.blogspot.com/2016/11/now-is-winter-of-our-discontent-our-era.
No comments:
Post a Comment