We have few doubts, however, that an hypocritical, scum rag outfit like the Times would stoop to such and try to mask it some way or another.
"Meaningful difference" tells the tale. So much for the rest of the story.
We don't know any of the participants nor do we care to. What we do know is a skunk when we smell one.
We don't normally take sides. In fact, we strive very hard not to. But in the semi-free, English-speaking world it's extremely difficult to find a more agenda-driven outfit. Maybe the Washington Post.
Paying a female less than a male doing the same job is so New York Times no further comment is necessary.
No comments:
Post a Comment