Everyone professed from the beginning in this election to be concerned about money buying elections.
Is there some correlation between money spent and being owned by those who donate or make such funds available? Or this just a who's spending what and where matter of no consequence? Is Washington really just about money without which there is no entrance to the ultimate prize, power?
Does a sudden upswing in spending say anything about a particular campaign, as in a sense of panic setting in? Why would someone like millionaire George Soros tell one of his PAC committees to donate money to a local election for, say, sheriff, in a far away state where the billionaire doesn't reside?
Something of note if the polls showing Trump closing the gap and maybe even making it a dead heat, who's trying to buy the election? Another fair question voters need an answer to and have a right to know before November is: Where is all that money coming from?
Is there some correlation between money spent and being owned by those who donate or make such funds available? Or this just a who's spending what and where matter of no consequence? Is Washington really just about money without which there is no entrance to the ultimate prize, power?
Does a sudden upswing in spending say anything about a particular campaign, as in a sense of panic setting in? Why would someone like millionaire George Soros tell one of his PAC committees to donate money to a local election for, say, sheriff, in a far away state where the billionaire doesn't reside?
Something of note if the polls showing Trump closing the gap and maybe even making it a dead heat, who's trying to buy the election? Another fair question voters need an answer to and have a right to know before November is: Where is all that money coming from?
No comments:
Post a Comment