The recent brouhaha over Melania Trump's convention speech raises lots of issues, not the least of which is intent. We have read much of the criticisms from the natty-headed academics to the agenda-driven partial crowd pretending impartiality to the Washington wonks and the editorial page hackneyed blokes.
It's troubling, to be sure. One would've thought given the controversy of this upcoming election the Trump people would have proofed the material better, but maybe it was left in there on purpose. If one believes the incessant MSM and disgruntled, displaced old fogy neocons like Romney, McCain and Rove who have been celebrating Trump's, to use a kind term, non-classic style of lying to people by looking them directly in the face, it's possible. Anything is possible isn't it?. Did you witness those twin towers in NYC almost 16 years ago?
But when something of this cosmic import crops up we need to go to a real expert. A plagiarism specialist. Joe Biden, are you still out there. Settle this for us, will you, Joe? Get the folks off these grammatical tenterhooks. This nation can't take too much more angst. We've now endured a president who denied getting his hat cleaned in the White House, another who had nocturnal visions of WMDs, one who couldn't pronounced the term government correctly and still another who promised to unite us. It's sincerely problematical if this nation could withstand a plagiarist, wife or no wife, in the White House.
So tell us, Joe. Is this really plagiarism?
No comments:
Post a Comment